science

You are currently browsing the archive for the science category.

Last summer Newsweek published a list of 50 recommended books to help understand our times.  The list is fascinating to look through and consider why some of the books were chosen.  To encourage a conversation about the books, Amy at My Friend Amy, started a reading project asking people to read one book, write about it, and then share the link on her website to spark conversation.  I chose City:  Rediscovering the Center by William H. Whyte for two reasons:  It was one of the last books available on the list and I knew my husband, Keith, the real estate attorney, would find it fascinating.  This is his review of the book:

Why are some cities vibrant, visually dynamic, and filled with people on the move and engaged with each other, while other cities lack many of these characteristics? What makes one section of New York a fantastic place to walk around, but other areas of the City appear unfriendly or menacing? Is it a matter of location and infrastructure or is it the result of city planning?

I always thought that city planners went to school and learned their craft attending lectures, and then on the job by sitting at their desks and analyzing plans. Maybe some do. William H. Whyte’s book argues that in order to make good planning decisions, the types of decisions that will positively impact the way in which people live in their cities, planners must go out onto the streets and understand the raw data of how people interact in public spaces. City describes how Whyte’s team studied interactions on city streets and translated this information into discernible patterns. They set up a number of cameras in different locations on a street and recorded the day-to-day interactions. Whyte dissected how people traveled the streets, where they visited, how they interacted with each other and in conjunction with the street’s infrastructure (bus stops, buildings, window ledges, etc.). Whyte drew conclusions about what makes a street work and how cities can improve the population’s experience.  One of my clients, who worked on the development of retail stores for the Walt Disney Company, told me that Disney studied many of these elements when deciding where to locate their stores. He recalled being quizzed by Michael Eisner, the then-CEO of Disney, on very specific details regarding pedestrian patterns and Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , ,

reitersBefore my trip to DC last month, I sent out a twitter message asking for recommendations for bookstores to visit.  DC is rich in bookstores:  Politics and Prose (review to come out soon), Kramer Books, Busboys and Poets, all of which were mentioned by my twitter buddies.  One message came through for Reiter’s.  I had seen Reiter’s on indiebound described as a technical bookstore and I don’t know anything technical, answering my e-mail can be challenging.  But, it was near my hotel, a real person recommended it, and it’s DC’s oldest indie (opened in 1936), so I stopped by.

Okay, most importantly, you don’t have to have a science mind to enjoy this store. I would describe it as a store that doesn’t have fiction and has extensive sections for subjects that full service booksellers only give a shelf.  There are numerous bookshelves devoted to medical topics, a row for engineering, another for computer stuff (I’m sure there’s a technical term for ”stuff”), non-fiction writing, architecture, biography, politics, economics, policy, and a kid’s section with all kinds of non-fiction and activity books.

Reiter’s is part store and part research location.  Tables and chairs are placed throughout with notices that books don’t need to be re-shelved, it reminded me of a library, and I saw several people perusing a book at the tables.

I enjoyed eavesdropping on two conversations.  At a large table at the back of the store, two scientists were settled in and solving the world’s problems.  I could tell they were strangers to each other, but they quickly compared their views on several issues (some I didn’t even understand) and chatted the entire time I wandered around.  Up front, a teacher dropped by for books on teaching legal issues to her high school class, she and the bookseller reviewed the books on the teacher’s list and then others recommended by the bookseller.  It was part sales and part lesson planning.  The lesson for me is that community doesn’t just spring up with literature and the humanities.

What did the non-techie walk out with?  The store had an abundance of study aids in all types of subjects.  I headed for the science section and picked up some for Chemistry for my son and the math section to pick up one for my daughter.  Let’s just say they weren’t ecstatic with their gifts.   However, next year, I’ll be calling Reiter’s and asking how I can help my kids with their new subjects.

Reiter’s

1990 K St. NW

Washington, DC 20006

T:  202.223.3327 or 800.537.4314

Share

Tags: , ,

Book lists abound at the beginning of summer and then again at Christmas.  Two distinct types of books generally populate these lists; lighter books for reading in the sun, preferably by a beach, pool, or campsite, and books with a more serious bent for the days when the we envision ourselves curling up by the fire with a book.  I live in Los Angeles where it is beautiful year round, but still find my reading falls into this timeline.  At one of my book groups, a member suggested reading Proust for the July meeting.  I very much want to read Proust, but said he should be read in the winter.  Swann’s Way feels oppressive in bright sunshine, for me there needs to be a bit of a chill in the air.

Few things catch my eye as quickly as a book list.  First, it’s a quick way to learn about new books, no long review of the book, just a snapshot.  Second, certain types of lists test my reading.  How many books on the greatest works of the 20th century/all time/American literature, etc. have I read?  I like the lists where I’ve read many of the books, I feel affirmed.

When this week’s Newsweek arrived I raised my eyebrows.  First, the cover isn’t Michael Jackson (and with all respect to his family and fans, I was relieved), although the newstand version has his picture, the subscriber one does not.  The cover is a picture of someone reading, a book (in paper), and the feature article is “What to Read Now.”  Not summer reading list, not the best whatever list, but what to read to understand our world better today.  50 books. 

First, a quick overview of the list, then the calculation.  Of the 50 books, I’ve read six, so I’m over the 10% mark, a mark only good as an interest rate on a savings account.  I tried adding in the books on the list that I own and that I have seen my Mom or Leslie reading.  It didn’t help too much. 

Books_SuperSLAHThe list is designed to help us understand our current world and the first book is The Way We Live Now by Anthony Trollope, written in 1875, that would be 134 years ago.   Actually, this isn’t the first time I’ve heard that book referenced, it’s about a financial and moral crisis in England and has a character that people have identified as Madoff.  If only more people read their classics. . .

The list is a combination of fiction, politics, history, sociology, psychology, religion, environmental, and science.   The topics chosen are interesting.  A couple of books on terrorism, of course, but also the roots of British soccer violence.  The environment is represented by Faulkner’s The Bear and Berry’s ode to the family farm in The Unsettling of America.  Biographies include J. Robert Oppenheimer (American Prometheus by Kai Bird and Martin F. Sherwin), Whittaker Chambers by Sam Tanenhaus as one of the founders of the modern right, and Winchell by Neal Gabler as the original Rush Limbaugh.  Race, war and film are covered also. 

It’s an interesting concept, thinking of books that help understand the world overall.  Which ones are you tempted to read?  Which ones would you choose?  I’m going to revise my list for the World Citizen Challenge with this in hand to broaden my viewpoint.

We’re not the only ones who want to hear your viewpoint on the books selected and your suggestions for other books, over at My Friend Amy there’s the opportunity to pick one of the books from the list to read and then discuss, join her conversation also.

FYI, Newsweek also crunched the top ten from several 100 Best Books lists and came up with their own Meta-list.  I did better here, I’ve read over 40% and heard of all but two of them.  Nothing very unusual about this list, War and Peace is first, 1984 second, and Ulysses is third.

Share

What should go to the top of your reading list during a pandemic?

The Swine Flu is on all our minds these days.  Kim and I went out to lunch with another friend last week and when someone in the restaurant coughed, we all looked at each other.  “Are you thinking what I’m thinking?” asked our friend.  “Swine Flu?”  Then we laughed and went back to eating. 

It’s not that we’re not worried at all, it’s just that it’s hard to know how worried to be.   I was shrugging off all the early reports about how this could be a real pandemic when Rob, to my surprise, said he thought there was a chance it could really become something scary.  Since I am the Official Worrier of the LaZebnik Household, I was thrown by the idea there was something that could worry him more than it does me.  (Well, something other than the kids throwing their bodies off of pieces furniture which I always watch with the complacency of a full-time parent who’s too worn out to object to anything that’s keeping them amused and which Rob always tries to stop, convinced someone will break something.  But I digress.)

A little probing revealed that the reason Rob was more worried than I was about a potentially devastating flu spreading through the world was because he had recently read The Great Influenza by John M. Barry, which is a very detailed description of the spread of the deadly and terrifying Spanish Influenza in 1918 in which millions and millions of people all over the world died. 

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Years ago, Claire and I attended a lecture by E.O. Wilson.  I have two distinct memories of that evening:  First, I heard a lot of stories about Ted, Claire’s brother, who is a Wilson fan.  Second, I decided to take responsibility for my science ignorance (one can only blame bad teaching for so long), so I vowed to read at least one science book a year.  (I read Charles C. Mann’s 1491 as my science book for 2008.)

Claire and I asked our two favorite science experts to give us suggestions for engaging books that even the likes of me would enjoy reading.  I think I’m set for a decade.  Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: ,