movie

You are currently browsing the archive for the movie category.

One of the pleasures of having a teenage daughter is the opportunity to share silly, girlly experiences.  While I understand all of the criticism about the Twilght series, and agree with some, as I’ve written before, I’ve enjoyed the ride.  Even more, I’m grateful for the opportunity to share the sheer reading fun with my daughter.  Kelsey has read the series multiple times, in fact her books look much worse for the wear.  I’ve read it once, in two reading saturated days, just like when I was a teenager.

One of the pleasures of living in Los Angeles is that occasionally we get a Hollywood experience, for us it meant that Kelsey and I had a mother-daughter date to the “Breaking Dawn-Part 1″ premiere and after party.  This is our second Twilight series date, we were able to attend the “Eclipse” event also.  This time was better for the fact that we knew it was going to be a terrific night.  Kelsey decided she wasn’t going to scream as much this time, I told her I was, and there was plenty to cheer about.  While I don’t recall any shirt-popping-turning-into-a-werewolf-scenes, the kiss after the vows was worth losing our voices over.  The wedding scene is beautiful.  The pacing was great, Bella’s nerves were appropriate (remember walking a straight line for several yards can be a challenge for her), and Edwards adoration obvious.

In many ways, this was my favorite movie of the series.  For me, the story is about Edward and Bella and everything else is frosting, sometimes too much frosting.  ”Eclipse” arguably may be the better movie, but this is a romance, let’s not make it anything more.  I liked the character development in “Eclipse” but there wasn’t enough Bella and Edward.  With “Breaking Dawn,” given that the bulk of the movie is about their wedding and honeymoon, we get to revel in their chemistry.  Bella gets a backbone in “Breaking Dawn” and I do wish that we would have seen a little more of that interaction between the two of them as she insisted on having the baby.

The reviews, as if they matter, are mixed.  The New York Times liked the movie and thought it was the best of the bunch.  The Los Angeles Times, not so much.  In some ways, it feels like the battle of the directors, which director did the reviewer like best.

In the end, my favorite scene from all four movies is the last 5 seconds of this one, especially given that this is just a pause before the rest of the story is told on November 16, 2012.  Great finish, even Kelsey cheered.

Share

Tags: , , ,

The first time I heard of The Help was from the owner of Between the Covers in Bend, OR.  Her description was so enticing I couldn’t wait to read it.  Then the bookseller realized that she had told so many people about the book, she sold them all.  That is the quintessential history of this book, one person telling another how much she likes it.  I wish I had a dollar for every time a bookseller or reader recommended this book to me.  (I always respond, “I enjoyed The Help, if you liked it, then read The Well and the Mine also.)  In record speed, The Help is a movie.  In fact, it felt like the movie raced the paperback.  Kathryn Stockett and Tate Taylor discuss the very un-Hollywood development of the movie on KCRW’s ‘The Business.’  It’s an interview that will leave you with a smile.

The movie is released on National Book Lovers Day.  Nice to know we have our own day!  Grab your book loving friends and go together, mine is meeting at the theater tomorrow night for a mid-summer night out.

Share

Tags: ,

I know, “Annie Hall” was great, but I was still reeling from some movie with a tiger and dubbed conversation that was so awful I actually left, and I never leave.  I think I watched “Annie Hall” with suspicion and never really settled in to enjoy it.  Since I’ve had kids I’ve wondered why any parent with young children would want to see Woody Allen in a movie, don’t they get enough whining at home?  Not to mention the whole pedophile thing with Mia’s daughter.

Then I heard about “Midnight in Paris” with it’s mix of art and literature, two of my favorite topics, and I grew intrigued.  I experienced the dubbed conversation movie debacle decades ago, so why not give Woody another chance?  Besides, Owen Wilson is charming, not whiny.   I didn’t have any idea about the plot, so when Zelda showed up I actually gasped and then giggled as Scott joined her immediately once he noticed Zelda talking to a strange male.  From then on it was rapid fire mingling with one great writer or artist after another.  I was trying to guess each character as they appeared, Dali was easy, Man Ray stumped me.

It’s pure joy reveling in the presence of Hemingway, Picasso, Dali, and Gertrude Stein.  The vignettes aren’t particularly illuminating, there isn’t any deep character analysis of the era or the people, just a romp through history exactly how many of us would dream of it.  Hemingway comes off overly macho with a dialogue full of clear, declarative sentences.  Fitzgerald is all charm.  Dali is dreamy and a bit incomprehensible, which pretty much describes his art.  Picasso is temperamental.  Kathy Bates gave Gertrude Stein a camp counselor/motherly aura that I’m not sure I believed, but I’d like to think she was the den mother for all the over-sized personalities.

I found the current story line a bit boring, a man dissatisfied with his contemporary life in Los Angeles (of course LA, the lazy and trite choice).  I impatiently waited to meet another superstar from the past.  ”Midnight in Paris” is the film version of the game ‘who would you invite to dinner if you could ask anyone from anytime?’  There is a message, the movie opens with the question what era would you live in if you could choose?  Owen Wilson answered Paris in the 1920s.  In my head, I answered, right now, right here.  But, I’m older than Owen Wilson.

I haven’t enjoyed a movie this much in ages, I left saying “that was written for me.”  What a surprise that it’s from Woody Allen.  If you love art and literature, this is a movie designed for you, go see it tonight.

[I don't understand why Van Gogh's style is in the movie poster, he doesn't appear, I don't recall that he was referred to, probably just an easy choice.]

Share

Tags: , , ,

[UPDATE:  THIS EVENT HAS BEEN POSTPONED]

One of my favorite examples of customers supporting their local independent bookstore, and it doesn’t hurt that the customer is Tom Hanks!  Fundraisers with unique events are a wonderful and fun way to celebrate reading, meet fellow reader, and support your local independent bookstore.  Katie at Village Books asked to spread the word about this event, I think it’s sure to be a wonderful experience for everyone.

Palisades Village Book Friends*

invites you to a special screening of

You’ve Got Mail

(You know, the one where the little independent bookstore goes out of business?)

with two-time Academy Award winner

TOM HANKS

Tuesday, May 24

Aero Theater

1328 Montana Ave, Santa Monica

Screening begins at 7:30 PM

$250 - includes a wine and hors d’oeuvres reception with Tom Hanks from 6:00 – 7:00 PM, reserved seating at the film, and the post-screening Q&A with Tom Hanks

$100 ($25 for students) – includes refreshments, the screening, and the Q&A with Tom Hanks afterwards. Doors open at 6:30 PM.  (There is a special deal for authors, so contact Katie at katie@pavillagebooks.com by Sunday night to take advantage of it and be included in the program.)

Seating is limited, so buy your tickets today! Tickets sold at the door will be $125!

Tickets can be purchased at Village Books, 1049 Swarthmore Avenue.  Or, send a check payable to Palisades Village Book Friends* to PVBF, P.O. Box 1553, Pacific Palisades, CA 90272.  Tickets will be held at Will Call on the night of the event.  All contributions to PVBF* for this event are tax-deductible. For more information, go to www.palivillagebooks.com Or call Ros Wolf at 310-612-6079 or 310-454-0747

If you can’t make it, but still want to support this special event and very worthy cause, please consider making a tax-deductible gift:

Caldecott Medal – $50  Newbery Medal – $100  Booker Prize – $250  Pulitzer Prize – $500  Nobel Prize – $ _______________(other)

*Palisades Village Book Friends is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) organization formed to promote and support literary events in our community and to ensure the continuation of the tradition started by Village Books of author readings, book signings and other literary events. All donations are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.

Share

Tags: , ,

As I walked through the Hammer exhibit “All of This and Nothing” I kept hearing music notes coming from deeper in the exhibition.  They sounded contemporary, with a bit a dissonance, but not jarring.  As I looked at the art, the music would float in and out of my consciousness.  I vaguely recall noticing the music was fuller at one point, and then back to single notes.  In the fifth room of the exhibition, I encountered Charles Gaines’ ‘Manifesto.’  I could have stayed in that room for ages.  I think there is a reason the museum did not put any benches there, people would be tempted to hang around for a long time.

‘Manifesto’ is a systematic musical interpretation of political manifestos from four radical organizations:  the International Socialist Congress, the Situationist International, the Black Panthers, and the Zapatista Army of National Liberation.  Gaines describes his work as exploring the relationship “between sound and letter or sound and word.”  He assigned each letter of the alphabet a musical notation, thereby composing a musical piece from a written document.

Visually, along one wall there are four black flat screens each placed on a press board cubed pedestal.  Other than the fact that there were four screens, the set up was reminiscent of many family rooms across the nation.  One at a time each screen scrolls through one of four manifestos with the accompanying music.  Once all four have scrolled and played alone, all four are played together.  On the other walls, a five foot tall sheet of music for each manifesto is framed.  The wooden frames provide a modern simplicity while the size gives an Old World monumentally to each work.  I felt a sense of tension between the warmth of the wood framed ecru paper and the cool starkness of  black technology.  Emotionally, I found the compositions charmingly dated with pencil markings and organic material while intellectually I wondered if the power of the words were subdued by their surroundings.  Do we lose some of their power to encourage us or enrage us in this setting?

Given that the notes aren’t composed musically (the relationship of one note to the next isn’t a product of it’s tone, but the result of the letter it was assigned to), the music is  pleasing.  When it’s played together, it sounds more like a mild Stravinsky than a jumble of notes.  I thought I was listening to a composition of stark contemporary music.  The text and the music fit together so well, Gaines wonders if people don’t believe him when he explains that he didn’t know how it would sound, he was working on the system, not the product.

I wasn’t that surprised, in one form or another the texts are about the same thing, a cry for the release from oppression of one kind or another.  Gaines believes that any text would sound the same, the content is irrelevant.  That may be true, but what sings to my heart isn’t Gaines’ system, but the experience of seeing these expressions of revolt and hearing the voices rise up in an entirely new way.

A live performance of Gaines Manifesto scores will occur at the Hammer on Wednesday, March 16th, if you’re in LA, it should be an interesting evening.

 

 

Share

Tags: , , ,

« Older entries