humor

You are currently browsing the archive for the humor category.

This Sunday the brackets will be revealed for the NCAA March Madness basketball tourney, but that’s not the I’m anticipating.  The funniest, most enjoyable, and completely irreverent book competition launches tomorrow – the Tournament of Books.  Several years ago, a bunch of book geeks (probably inebriated book-a-holics) wondered why basketball should have all the fun?  Why not pit one book against another in a sweet sixteen match to the death?  Or, should I say, to the Rooster, because the winner of this literary mash up receives a live rooster.  Just what I’m sure Claire is daydreaming about right now as she scrambles to finish the last draft of her latest novel.  All that work to earn a rooster pooping all over her back lawn.  Now that she’s a vegetarian, she couldn’t even eat it.  Do people eat rooster?

There’s a different judge for each match up, some are editors or at-large-book-know-it-alls, and others are authors.  Commentary for every match is provided by John Warner and Kevin Guilfoile and in true Tournament of Books fashion, I can’t remember who they are and I don’t really care.  But, I love their banter.  This will give you a sense of their style:

John:   I’m excited to put the Rooster-red blazer back on and join you in the booth for this year’s commentary. In a continuation of a tradition reaching back to last year, we’ve tried to actually read the books in the Tournament. I think I might’ve done a bit better than you, having completed 14 of 16 and sampled the other two. This is mostly due to me having read four of the contenders prior to the announcement of the brackets, though.

Kevin:  I started reading with the intention of running the table, but life intervened, and by “life,” of course I mean Life Unexpected, which airs Tuesday nights on the WB . . . I finished better than half of this year’s contenders, and if I can inject some early optimism into the proceedings, I personally found this year’s field to be very Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , , ,

Two Humorous Videos

Unbridled Books explains how reading can be dangerous:

Be careful who you invite to your book clubs:

Share

Tags: ,

I am a huge, huge fan of David Sedaris.  He visits LA every spring and the tickets for his show sell out as if it were a U2 concert.  I’ve been known to subscribe to a series a UCLA in order to get the chance to buy a ticket.  Claire and I have had multiple conversations about which Sedaris essay we like the best.  Whenever I read something that is too dark for me, I read it in Sedaris’ voice to get through it.  I love David Sedaris.

The Santaland Diaries is the first Sedaris essay I heard.  I was getting ready for work one morning and literally dropped to my knees I was laughing so hard.  Another time I was driving to work and had to pull over because I couldn’t drive with my eyes squeezed closed in laughter.  I’ll share the piece of advice I tell everyone the first time they hear Sedaris, “go to the bathroom because you could pee in your pants.”

Take a break from the hustle and bustle, grab some hot chocolate and get ready to laugh (no need to watch the screen, it doesn’t change):

Part 2 Part 3 Part 4

In honor of Christmas, we’ll be taking a few days off, but will return for a few final reading challenge posts (nothing like leaving it to the last minute).   For Claire, Christmas is a wonderful holiday to spend with the family, for me, it is a precious day of faith.  However you celebrate the holiday, we hope that it is joyous for you.

Share

Tags: , ,

9781594484001In The Wordy Shipmates, Sarah Vowell makes it very clear that she isn’t writing about the Pilgrims of the Mayflower.  In fact, one of her motivations in writing the book is to highlight the fact that there were very influential Puritans who didn’t 1) arrive on the Mayflower, or 2) hunt witches in Salem.  Sarah’s Puritans are the non-separatists (the Mayflower inhabitants were separatists, an important distinction that Sarah clearly spells out in the book) who arrived about a decade later as part of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and founded Boston.  Dust off your American history and these names will sound vaguely familiar:  John Winthrop, Roger Williams, Anne Hutchinson, John Cotton.  The religious zealots that founded our nation both literally and, as Sarah points out, intellectually.

The foundation of the book is Winthrop’s A Model of Christian Charity speech in which he invokes “a city upon a hill” from the Book of Matthew in the New Testament.  More than one President took up the phrase from Winthrop.  Sarah explains, “The most important reason I am concentrating on Winthrop and his shipmates in the 1630s is that the country I live in is haunted by the Puritan’s vision of themselves as God’s chosen people, as a beacon of righteousness that all others are to admire.”  She points out that the seal of the Massachusetts Bay Colony includes an Indian with the words “Come over and help us” coming out of his mouth.  Sarah noted that ever since we have been helping people to death.

A Model of Christian Charity sets out a road map for how the Puritans are to live in community:  the rich are to help the poor, all are to mourn together, rejoice together, take on each others “conditions.”  Sarah calls it a declaration of dependence.  She then sets out to look at how Winthrop and his Puritans lived up to the ideal.  They failed miserably.  Enter stage left, Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson, on scene to prove that Winthrop’s community is a model of charity as long as everyone agrees with him and the leadership he established. 

Sarah chronicles the founding years of the Massachusetts Bay Colony inhabited by bookish people.  A subject matter that could turn deadly dull in an instant, Sarah describes with humor and a knack for showing the continuing relevance of the events.  Sarah finds Winthrop, with all of his flaws and inconsistencies, laudable and lovable, but hard to like.  Williams and Hutchinson, two people who have come down through history as outcasts for standing up for religious freedom retain their reputation, but are also fanatics.  Quite frankly, I would have been happy to see them go myself.

At her reading at Book Soup earlier this month, Sarah explained that she decided to write the book after hearing the “the city on a hill” image used during Ronald Reagen’s funeral.  The irony that the term was used by Winthrop to describe a city where the poor were helped and everyone contributed to the betterment of the community when Reagen aggressively slashed programs for the poor was not lost on her.  Winthrop declared that Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , ,

Hong Kong Bookstore

Shelf Awareness posted this picture of a bookstore in Hong Kong and mentioned some of the ways it’s title has been used.  Here’s mine, an independent bookseller’s answer to the following question:

“Can I buy the new Barbara Kingsolver book for $9/$8.99/$8.98?”

Tell us how you would use the name of this unique Hong Kong bookstore!

Share

Tags: , ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »