book review

You are currently browsing the archive for the book review category.

Claire’s new book, her first young adult novel, Epic Fail, hits the shelves on Tuesday, August 2nd!  If you are a Jane Austen fan, run and get the book.  It’s a YA re-telling of Pride and Prejudice set in a Los Angeles high school.  It’s romantic, there are several moments when I was swept back to the gaga days of teenage love and not a single vampire or werewolf was present.  After reading Epic Fail I felt how embarrassing and inappropriate Mrs. Bennett acted.  I always mentally understood, by my era is not Austen’s so I never cringed.  During Epic Fail, get ready to groan at the mother’s antics.

Kelsey first read Pride and Prejudice and Epic Fail immediately afterward.  We went to a special mother-daughter lunch to compare the books and how one reflected on the other.  Interested in nudging a teenager to read a classic?  Pairing these two together, and throwing in a bribe of a special lunch date, is a perfect enticement.

Learn more about Epic Fail by following the blog tour:

Monday, July 25: Sit Here and Read

Tuesday, July 26: Flippin Pages for All Ages

Wednesday, July 27: Books Complete Me

Thursday, July 28: Alison Can Read

Friday, July 29: Mundie Moms

Monday, August 1: CA Marshall

Go Buy the Book Day!  Tuesday, August 2: Alison Can Read

Wednesday, August 3: Only Sexy Books Allowed

Friday, August 5: A Good Addiction

 

Share

Tags: , ,

I’m sure I’ve mentioned before that Joseph Ellis is my favorite historian.  He’s concise and erudite, for me very high praise.  I love non-fiction, but I dread being on page 500 of a biography and still haven’t reached the event for which the person is famous.  I don’t want to know that much about any event or life, not even my own.  Ellis tells the reader the salient facts with the supporting information that’s necessary to understand the person’s life or event, all in an enjoyable narrative.  (I liked his biography of Jefferson also, 464 pages for Jefferson’s entire life and I feel like a have a solid working understanding of it).  I’ve read many of Ellis’ books, the first and best, in my opinion is Founding Brothers:  The Revolutionary Generation.

The book looks at six decisive moments in the American Revolution including a dinner party during which the location of the capitol was decided (it’s intentional that our financial center and our political center are separate), the Hamilton Burr duel (juicy with an academic nuance), Washington’s Farewell Address (under Ellis’ pen George doesn’t appear quite so dry), and the friendship between Adams and Jefferson.  After reading the book, I’ll never forget that they both died on July 4th, within hours of one another; that’s a relationship deeply entwined with each other and the nation they created.

By providing these six vignettes, Ellis’ book is a lighter read than a slog through a chronological history, but it’s packed with information.   I have a renewed appreciation for Adams (I can’t wait to read Ellis’ latest book about John and  Abigail) and an understanding that there is nothing new about our current contentious political atmosphere, it is inherent in our system.  This is history that comes up all the time in conversation.  The roots of our financial system go back to Jefferson and Madison.  The underlying issues in race relations are foundational in our system from the time of the Constitution, everyone was well aware of the issue and knew that it was being foisted on future generations.  Ellis argues that slavery was the sacrifice to ensure a Constitution and a nation.  Every time I’m in DC I think about the dinner party that decided that our nation would be lead from the middle.

Founding Brothers is a history book that is a joy to read and one that I’ve recalled over and over again.  Read it and let me know what you think.

And if you’re up a dramatic reading of the Declaration of Independence, check out this version with several stars including Whoopi Goldberg, Michael Douglas, Kathy Bates and Mel Gibson, it never sounded so good!

Share

Tags: , ,

This extended essay is an observation of how our impulse to control nature deadens the human experience.  Fowles opens the essay by contrasting his father’s perfectly pruned fruit trees to his own gone-to-seed acres.  Our desire to identify, examine, name and categorize is another method of trying to tame the wild, but this effort comes at a cost:

Naming things is always implicitly categorizing and therefore collecting them, attempting to own them; and because man is a highly acquisitive creature, brainwashed by most modern societies into believing that the act of acquisition is more enjoyable than the fact of having acquired, that getting beats having got, mere names and the objects they are tied to soon become stale. . . But we are far better at seeing the immediate advantages of such gains in knowledge of the exterior world than at assessing the cost of them.  The particular cost of understanding the mechanism of nature, of having so successfully itemized and pigeon-holed it, lies most of all in the ordinary person’s perception of it, in his or her ability to live with and care for it–and not see it as challenge, defiance, enemy.

In fact, Fowles beautifully argues that we will truly conserve nature when we stop evaluating it for its purpose.  Learning about nature can feel like a discourse rather than an experience.  Our interaction is too heavily weighted to knowledge at the sacrifice of understanding.  Even nature films can be a disservice because the wonder of wild places is muted by knowledge divorced from experience.  Fowles yearns for the eighteenth century approach of viewing “nature as a mirror for philosophers, as an evoker of emotion, as a pleasure, a poem.”  Nature that is experienced not just mentally but as an “entire human being.”

Fowles finds a similar parrallel in art.  He describes the artist’s self-expression and self-discovery as the deepest benefit of art.  Yet, as with nature, art is parcelled, labeled, and analysized in a vocabulary similar to science.  He sees the paradox of this “knowing-naming technique” being applied to a non-scientific object that even the artist (the actual creator) would find difficult to articulate.

Fowles attributes his writing process to the hours of solitary exploration meandering in the local woods.  His story development doesn’t evolve from an clearly defined outline, but a messy wandering along a narrative.  One topic that kept reoccurring in my mind as I read the essay was fear, as I envisioned myself ambling through a wood I felt vulnerable.  Fowles delineates the history of the danger myth, much of which has to do with a need to control society and associating wilderness with a wild nature.  He advocates turning that on its head, that the way to save nature is stop viewing it as detached from ourselves, to see it as interwoven in our lives as part of the human existence.

Fowles argues that the meaningful human experiences with nature and art are ultimately indescribable.  Nevertheless, he ends the essay relaying an experience in an old growth forest, Wistman’s Wood.  Fowles writing was beautiful as he painted the trees and his walk, I felt he walked into another magical world.  Almost beyond words, Fowles gave me a glimpse of the majesty and wonder of his experience.

Fowles essay doesn’t state facts or figures, it creates a love of and desire to experience nature far beyond trail descriptions and bird lists.  Reading The Tree is a wonderful way to commemorate Earth Day.

Share

Tags: , ,

I haven’t discussed a translated book in awhile, but I’ve read a couple lately that I enjoyed so I’m bringing this series back for a reprise.  To the End of the Land is the story of friendship, family and Israel.  It follows Ora and Avram as they hike and Ora tells Avram the story of their son.

Grossman’s book To the End of the Land kept me on the verge of tears.  What made the book universal for me was a mother letting go of her son.  The theme of saying goodbye was heart-wrenching.    I don’t have to send a son I’ve raised with empathy and care into a war zone at age eighteen, but I do have a son leaving for college in 17 months and life will not be the same.  Our relationship will change, my role will be different.  There will be joy and loss in that process.  Reading To the End of the Land stirred the grieving that accompanies this transition.

Grossman’s characters live with a constant sense of the fragility of life.  Another universalism, that we could all get hit by the proverbial bus tomorrow, feels heightened in Grossman’s Israel.  The randomness of pulling a name out of a hat, the name picked is tortured by Arabs, the one not is tortured by guilt.  Whether or not the bus you’re riding on will be bombed, or the one passing you in cross traffic.  The fear of both sons partying at the same bar because it could be the one a suicide bomber visits that night.  Americans don’t live with that same day-to-day fear.  Not only do the characters, and presumably Israelis, live with the underlying fear of random death, there is a sense that the nation could cease to exist:

“Look at them,” Avram had said to her once, in one of their drives around the streets of Tel Aviv after he got back.  ”Look at them.  They walk down the street, they talk, they shout, read newspapers, go to the grocery store, sit in cafes”–he went on for several minutes describing everything they saw through the car window–”but why do I keep thinking it’s all one big act?  That it’s all to convince themselves that this place is truly real?”

“You’re exaggerating,” Ora had said.

“I don’t know, maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t think that Americans or the French have to believe so hard all the time just to make America exist.  Or France, or England.”

I grew up in a world where Israel existed, it never occurred to me that a country, especially an ally, could disappear until I attended a lecture a few years ago given by an Israeli political scientist.  The room was filled with about 200 senior citizens, mostly Jewish.  The lecturer asked how many people thought Israel would not survive and a significant majority raised their hands.  As the discussion progressed, it became clear that many believed the state of Israel was a phase; it was not permanent.  I thought of that room when I read the above passage.  The conscious effort to make Israel real is strikingly different from the unarticulated fundamental belief that the United States is permanent.

I wonder if this fear and mindset heightens the sense of life in Israel.  If so, I didn’t get that impression from Grossman’s book.  The richness of family life is well relayed, but not an exuberance.  Grossman’s main characters are very insular.  My primary criticism of this wonderful book is that the characters sometimes felt flat.  I don’t think it’s because of it being translated, I believe it is a result of the private world Grossman creates for them.  Ora, Ilan and Avram bond in the hospital when Israel is under attack, in a fever, in the dark.  There are only the three of them for the first section of the book, the lone Arab nurse is down the hall.  The balance of the book permeates with a world limited by this character triangle.  It is expanded by the the birth of Adam and Ofer but always feels in reference to just the three of them.  Never seeing Ora outside of these relationships, never with a girlfriend or at work, left me feeling like she was a conduit the author used to stir emotions in me rather than a fully realized character.

Grossman leads the reader on a thought-provoking journey filled with emotion.  This isn’t a fast read, it’s paced to match the walk.  It’s a trip I’m willing to take over and over again.

Share

Tags: , , ,

Here it is January 4th and I never wrote a 2010 wrap up post or my goals for 2011.  I had every intention of doing so, all last week I thought “tomorrow.”  Last week ended up being filled with a whole lot of, well, nothing.  We watched movies, slept, and read by the fire.  The rainstorms battering Los Angeles fueled our desire to hunker down and be bums.  I have to say that with very little instruction, we imitate sloths like we were born to it.  Alas, all good things come to end.  Today, Keith was at work, the kids were at school, and I spent multiple hours in the car.

It seems a little late to go into last year, but I noticed on my twitter feed the question ‘what was the best book you read in 2010′ still popped up today.  It’s a question I’ve answered differently the last few weeks.  One would think that the term “best” would mean only one, but such a person doesn’t live with an adolescent daughter who names multiple best friends. For me, it’s a toss up between two books, Room by Emma Donoghue and The Children’s Book by A.S. Byatt.

Room makes it into the lightening round as a uniquely written book.  Donoghue perfectly created a world and kept the reader within a very restricted point of view.  The author carefully fiddled with the English language and subtly gave new meaning to everyday words.  The story matches the level of writing.  Ma is my new heroine.  I’ve heard mothers say they’re sure they would have done the same thing.  I’m not so sure, really not, I’d like to think so but I plan on never finding out.  Most importantly, I’ve spent far more time thinking about the book than it took to read it.  (I can probably count on my body parts how many times I’ve thought that about a book.)   It’s a quick read packed with questions about our society and lifestyle.  Why do we blame the victim?  Is TV junk for our brains?  We talk about what is important, but does how we allot our time reflect our values?  The book is a jewel that surpasses all my criteria:  beautifully written, solid story, great ending, and thought provoking.

If Room feels like something new, The Children’s Book is a model of the well crafted family saga.  Byatt’s writing is lyrical.  The main character is a children’s book author and the tone throughout draws the reader in like a fairy tale.  This book is what it describes, but much more.  The literary, historical and art references interwoven into the story weren’t just side notes, they were fully incorporated and moved the story forward.  In my opinion, Byatt took the family saga genre to a whole new level.  It is a 21st century modern Dickensian novel.

I’ve thought a bit about trying to decide between the two.  I found that when I answered a twitter or Facebook question about my favorite book, if I picked one over the other my last decision wasn’t intellectual, it was emotional.  I read 65 books last year (low for me, but in fact my 2011 goal maybe to read less books rather than more).  Deciding the top two was an intellectual exercise, mostly described above.  But, the times when I picked Room as the best book seemed to be when I was running around and active, the book charges me.  When I shot off a message answering The Children’s Book, it was when I was craving cozy.  The Children’s Book is highly thought provoking, but it isn’t really upsetting or jarring, it’s a fabulous curl up on the couch and read.

How did you choose your favorite book of 2010?  Was there one stand out or a close match?  If it was close, what tips the balance?

Today I decided not to choose.  When Vroman’s sent out a tweet asking for my favorite book, I answered both.  Maybe that’s a good new year’s resolution, I choose not to choose.

Share

Tags: , ,

« Older entries