September 2009

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for September 2009.

FREAD09smThis week is Banned Book Week, a moment when libraries, bookstores and readers stop and pay attention to the fact that reading what we chose is a right that must be protected.  Challenges to books are widespread, over 500 were reported last year, and occur across the nation.  Previously we posted about the activities centered around Banned Book Week. 

A couple of years ago, my son entered an essay contest during Banned Book Week advocating the importance of books like The Perks of a Wallflowerby Stephen Chbosky.  He won the contest!  Here is his essay, my favorite part is when he points out that it is better to learn some things through a book rather than by experience:

The challenging of Stephen Choboskys’ novel, The Perks of Being a Wallflower, is unwarranted because the book accurately talks about issues that plague teens everywhere.  Before reading the novel over the weekend, I did not know about the different actual effects of drugs like LSD and pot, and under what circumstances they would do such damaging things.  The character Charlie is well developed in his correspondence to the unknown recipient. The reader gets the sense that they can understand why Charlie would smoke and do drugs.  It was a real eye opener to me, and the novel was an insight into what desperate and ignorant teens actually do.  Charlie’s friends, including Patrick, Sam, and his sister are not portrayed as perfect characters, but they always are there when Charlie needs them, and they are very real in the sense that they talk about their place in the world and make big and small mistakes.

Many people would miss out on the education about sex, drugs, and alcohol that no teen will learn in health class in school.  Besides, if teens don’t learn this way, the other way to learn is to actually experiment with the substances, which is generally illegal.  When you take away books like these, you take away the safe learning of teens that would otherwise damage themselves for a long time afterwards.  I did not know about this side of teen culture before reading this book, and now I have a better view of what actually happens when you smoke, drink, or do drugs. Do not ban this book.

Share

Tags: , ,

28827776What better way to learn art history than to have it mixed with 500 year old gossip?  Giorgio Vasari’s The Lives of the Artists is a jumble of fact and fiction.  Does this make the first art history book less valuable?  Maybe if I was writing a scholarly paper, but for me, it’s fun romp with the big shots of Renaissance art.

Vasari’s book provides a deeper understanding to Renaissance art without burying the reader in technical jargon.  I love art, I love discussing it, I love reading about it, but I roll my eyes when I see a sentence full of words that I individually understand, but together are a jumble.  The Lives of the Artists exposed the back story of artists and several of their works.  The experience of walking around the Pantheon and Duomo was richer after learning how Brunelleschi crawled all over the Pantheon measuring and calculating in order to crack the ancient secret of building a dome. 

My favorite stories are the legendary ones.  Brunelleschi comment that Donatello’s crucifix made Christ look like a peasant caused him to challenge Brunelleschi to sculpt a better one.  In secret Brunelleschi does and surprises Donatello with it.  In shock, Donatello drops the raw eggs he is carrying for their lunch and stomps away.  Now both crucifixes are placed across town in separate Florentine cathedrals.  I visited the cathedrals consecutively just to better compare crucifixes.  

Vasari explores artistic obsession in The Lives of the Artists.  Vasari’s described Uccello almost complete descent into madness trying to perfect perspective.  The story of Castagno’s plotting murder of Veneziano out of envy and ambition caused me to pay more attention to both of their works even though the story is completely false.  Since Veneziano outlived Castagno by at least four years, it would be difficult for Castagno to kill him.  Although, I wondered if Castagno was so ambitious in life that he would be happy to remembered even if for a false murder, and that Vasari correctly portrayed the essence of the artist.  Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , ,

Has their time come again?

At lunch today with a group of girlfriends (including Kim), I mentioned the brilliant writer Maile Meloy whose recently published collection of short stories was reviewed on the front page of the New York Times Book Review not long ago.   And in a recent post, Kim expressed surprise that four out of the six books nominated for the National Book Awards’ top honors were short story collections.  Are short stories having  some kind of a renaissance?

That question led to a discussion of how we all felt about short stories.  One friend said she loves reading them: they make the perfect bedtime reading, she explained (and I’ve heard others express this same feeling), because you can read one, finish it, and go to bed feeling like you’ve accomplished something.   For those of us who spend our days hurtling from jobs to children to housekeeping to email to lord knows what, getting through an entire novel is a task somewhat akin to climbing Mt. Everest only without any Sherpas to help drag us up. Read the rest of this entry »

Share
us-flag-american-literature72

Illustration by Wojtek Kozak, www.wkozak.com

Marianne Wiggins, author most recently of Evidence of Things Unseen and The Shadow Catcher and professor at USC, recently compiled a list of the best American Literature.  She made the list at the request of an attendee at one of her recent public lectures with the caveat that while she wouldn’t take any work off the list, there are certainly some works that she would add with more thought.  Here are the books that she advocates are the best in our history:

  • James Agee – A Death in the Family
  • Louisa May Alcott – Little Women
  • Sherwood Anderson – Winesburg, Ohio
  • Willa Cather – The Song of the Lark
  • Truman Capote – In Cold Blood
  • Raymond Carver – Collected Stories
  • Stephen Crane – The Red Badge of Courage
  • EL Doctorow – Ragtime and The Book of Daniel
  • Ralph Ellison – The Invisible Man (Agree?  Vote for The Invisible Man to win the Best National Book Awards Fiction)
  • Ernest  Hemingway- Men Without Women, In Our Time, and A Moveable Feast
  • Henry James – What Maise Knew
  • Denis Johnson – Jesus’ Son
  • William Kennedy – The Albany Series (Ironweed)
  • Elmore Leonard – Get Shorty
  • Cormac McCarthy – The Cities of the Plain Trilogy, Blood Meridian, No Country for Old Men, The Road
  • Herman Melville – Moby Dick and The Confidence Man
  • Joyce Carol Oates – Collected Stories
  • Flannery O’Connor – Collected Stories (another one of the six finalists for the Best of the National Book Awards Fiction)
  • John O’Hara – Collected Stories
  • Annie Proulx – The Shipping News
  • JD Salinger – Nine Stories
  • Gertrude Stein – The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas
  • John Steinbeck – The Grapes of Wrath and Travels with Charlie
  • Mark Twain – Collected Works
  • John Updike – The “Rabbit” Works
  • Tobias Wolfe – Collected Stories

Although she didn’t list Phillip Roth, I have heard her describe Roth and McCarthy as the best living American writers.  Regarding Roth, she recommended reading The Counterlife, American Pastoral and then everything he wrote after American Pastoral.

I find her list interesting, especially the works she did and didn’t pick for Cather, James, Hemingway and Steinbeck.   I would have assumed From Whom the Bell Tolls for Hemingway, but I’ve never read In Our Time. Now, I’m curious about In Our Time and otherwise wouldn’t have given it a thought.

I noticed that Edith Wharton isn’t on the list, and maybe Prof. Wiggins didn’t think of her; the next time I see her, that’s the author I’m going to ask about.  Which books would you add to the list?

Share

Tags:

national book fdnPreviously we wrote about how the National Book Foundation is celebrating its 60th anniversary by post a book-a-day blog highlighting the 77 winners (this is well worth perusing, hopefully the National Book Foundation will retain a link on their site) and then choosing the best of the best.  How is the best chosen?

First, over 600 writers were sent e-mails asking them to pick their top three National Book Award winners.  The top six were released today and now the public has a month to vote for their favorite.  America, here are your top six finalists (my attempt to sound like Ryan Seacrest):

Invisible Man, by Ralph Ellison

The Stories of John Cheever

The Collected Stories of Eudora Welty

Gravity’s Rainbow, by Thomas Pynchon

The Collected Stories of William Faulkner

The Complete Stories of Flannery O’Connor (which maybe compensates for not winning the award for A Good Man is Hard to Find)

I’m surprised that four of the six are collections of short stories.  Short stories get short shrift (try saying that five times fast), maybe this will throw some light on their beauty and importance. 

Who will you vote for?  I’m going back and forth between Ellison, Cheever and Welty and am enjoying the choice too much to make a decision just yet.  Don’t worry if you haven’t read them all, advocate for your favorite.  Even better, go back and read the ones you haven’t read before October 21st so you can make a fully informed vote.  But vote.

Share

« Older entries